Re: [exim] Help sought with fairly complex DKIM set up and F…

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: Todd Lyons
Dátum:  
Címzett: Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. MBCS G8TIC
CC: Exim User List
Tárgy: Re: [exim] Help sought with fairly complex DKIM set up and Facebook
I tend to think that you just happened to pick one of a few that
failed. On my systems, since Sunday's logrotation, 0.1% if inbound
messages had failed signatures:

OVZ-CentOS63[root@ivlog52 ~]# grep facebookmail
/disk1/log/exim/main.log | grep DKIM | wc -l
7086
OVZ-CentOS63[root@ivlog52 ~]# grep facebookmail
/disk1/log/exim/main.log | grep DKIM | grep -v "verification
succeeded" | wc -l
9

Upon further digging, every one of those 9 emails appear to have been
forwarded through another mail server:

OVZ-CentOS63[root@ivlog52 ~]# exigrep
"d=facebookmail\.com.*verification failed" /disk1/log/exim/main.log |
grep DMARC
2014-02-23 02:24:15 1WHOji-00028R-Or DMARC results:
spf_domain=foxmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-23 02:24:15 1WHOji-00028R-Or H=smtpbg177.qq.com
[119.147.194.228] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-23 19:48:04 1WHf1s-0001tQ-Cs DMARC results:
spf_domain=gmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-23 19:48:04 1WHf1s-0001tQ-Cs H=mail-bk0-f43.google.com
[209.85.214.43] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed sender's
DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-24 03:49:21 1WHmXb-0005Kz-A2 DMARC results:
spf_domain=foxmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-24 03:49:21 1WHmXb-0005Kz-A2 H=smtpbg177.qq.com
[119.147.194.228] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-24 20:11:18 1WI1rv-00037F-3W DMARC results:
spf_domain=gmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-24 20:11:18 1WI1rv-00037F-3W H=mail-bk0-f43.google.com
[209.85.214.43] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed sender's
DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-25 02:42:59 1WI7yx-0006TS-9J DMARC results:
spf_domain=foxmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-25 02:42:59 1WI7yx-0006TS-9J H=smtpbg177.qq.com
[119.147.194.228] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-25 19:28:28 1WINg3-0000jb-94 DMARC results:
spf_domain=gmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-25 19:28:28 1WINg3-0000jb-94 H=mail-bk0-f49.google.com
[209.85.214.49] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed sender's
DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-26 03:23:47 1WIV5z-0005F9-55 DMARC results:
spf_domain=foxmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-26 03:23:47 1WIV5z-0005F9-55 H=smtpbg175.qq.com
[119.147.194.226] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-27 02:58:18 1WIrAs-0007Xw-EV DMARC results:
spf_domain=foxmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-27 02:58:18 1WIrAs-0007Xw-EV H=smtpbg175.qq.com
[119.147.194.226] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

2014-02-27 19:55:48 1WJ73b-0004iO-Ad DMARC results:
spf_domain=gmail.com dmarc_domain=facebookmail.com spf_align=no
dkim_align=no enforcement='Reject'
2014-02-27 19:55:48 1WJ73b-0004iO-Ad H=mail-ea0-f182.google.com
[209.85.215.182] Warning: Message from facebookmail.com failed
sender's DMARC policy, would REJECT

...Todd

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. MBCS G8TIC
<mike.tubby@???> wrote:
> Exim fans,
>
> I run some mail relays for a few hundred domains that I look after and
> want to perform fairly complex DKIM checking - I want to:
>
>     * enforce DKIM tests domains that are 'known signers' (google,
> facebook, etc) and explicitly accept or deny mail based on the result of
> the DKIM checks - to avoid faked email
>     * allow through mail with no signatures (obvious)
>     * support a 'DKIM whitelist' for domains that send with DKIM but
> have a known fault/problem
>     * skip checks on hosts/domains we relay for
>     * skip checks on authenticated connections from MUAs (clients)
>     * defer if a message that has a signature is not testable, eg.
> cannot retrieve their DKIM key, key has syntax error, etc.

>
>
> Systems are: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32-bit + Exim 4.82 built from source
>
>
>
> here's my DKIM ACL:
>
> ###
> ### ack_check_dkim: this ACL is used for checking DKIM
> ###
>
> #
> # acl_m2 set to zero on start for normal/full checks, set to 1 if
> white-listed
> #
>
> acl_check_dkim:
>
>         #
>         # start of DKIM debug message and clear macro
>         #
>         warn    set acl_m2 = 0
>                 logwrite = DKIM START: domain=$sender_address_domain
> possible_signer=$dkim_cur_signer status=$dkim_verify_status ${if
> def:dkim_verify_reason {(reason=$dkim_verify_reason) }}

>
>
>         #
>         # strict checking on known signers...
>         #
>         deny    sender_domains = +dkim_known_signers
> #               dkim_signers = +dkim_known_signers
>                 dkim_status = none:invalid:fail
>                 message = Message from $sender_address_domain (known
> signer) with invalid or missing signature
>                 logwrite = DKIM DENY: Rejected $sender_address_domain is
> known signer (in database) but has invalid/missing signature

>
>         accept  sender_domains = +dkim_known_signers
> #               dkim_signers = +dkim_known_signers
>                 dkim_status = pass
>                 logwrite = DKIM PASS: Accepted $sender_address_domain is
> known signer and has good signature
>                 add_header = :after_received:X-DKIM-Result:
> Domain=$sender_address_domain Result=Good and Known Domain

>
>
>         #
>         # ignore noise where we have no signature
>         #
>         accept  dkim_status = none
> #               logwrite = DKIM SKIP: Skipping DKIM checks - no
> signature for: $dkim_cur_signer

>
>         #
>         # skip DKIM if domain whitelisted for DKIM, i.e. known good
> domain that has broken DKIM
>         #
>         accept  sender_domains = +dkim_whitelist_domains
>                 logwrite = DKIM SKIP: Skipping DKIM checks for
> whitelisted domain: $sender_address_domain
>                 set acl_m2 = 1

>
>         #
>         # skip DKIM checks on hosts we relay for
>         #
>         accept  hosts = +relay_from_hosts
>                 logwrite = DKIM SKIP: Skipping DKIM checks for relay
> host: $sender_fullhost

>
>
>         #
>         # skip DKIM checks on authenticated hosts (that we also relay for)
>         #
>         accept  authenticated = *
>                 logwrite = DKIM SKIP: Skipping DKIM checks for
> authenticated host: $sender_fullhost

>
>
>         #
>         # defer when message not testable, e.g. can't get public key, etc.
>         #
>         defer   dkim_status = invalid
>                 message = Message from $sender_address_domain cannot be
> verified
>                 logwrite = DKIM DEFER: domain=$sender_address_domain

>
>         #
>         # accept the message (correctly signed)
>         #
>         accept  dkim_status = pass
>                 sender_domains = $sender_address_domain
>                 dkim_signers = $sender_address_domain
>                 logwrite = DKIM PASS: domain=$sender_address_domain
> signer=$dkim_cur_signer status=$dkim_verify_status
>                 add_header = :after_received:X-DKIM-Result:
> Domain=$sender_address_domain Result=Signature OK

>
>         #
>         # accept the message EVEN IF the signature FAILS! due to white
> listing
>         #
>         accept  condition = ${if eq {$acl_m2}{1}}
>                 dkim_status = fail
>                 sender_domains = $sender_address_domain
>                 dkim_signers = $sender_address_domain
>                 logwrite = DKIM FAIL (WHITELISTED):
> domain=$sender_address_domain status=$dkim_verify_status - DKIM failed
> but message accepted
>                 add_header = :after_received:X-DKIM-Result:
> Domain=$sender_address_domain Result=FAIL (but whitelisted)

>
>         #
>         # deny (strict) when message fails signature test *and* acl_m2 =
> 0 (not whitelisted)
>         #
>         deny    condition = ${if eq {$acl_m2}{0}}
>                 dkim_status = fail
>                 sender_domains = $sender_address_domain
>                 dkim_signers = $sender_address_domain
>                 message = Message from has invalid DKIM signature
>                 logwrite = DKIM FAIL (DENY):
> domain=$sender_address_domain - message rejected!

>
>         #
>         # accept anything else (should never get here)
>         #
>         accept  logwrite = DKIM DEFAULT: domain=$sender_address_domain -
> message accepted (at end of ACL)

>
>
> NB. hostlists and domainlists are read from MySQL tables and are in
> standard exim form
>
>
>
>
>
> My setup works for the most of the time including Google/Gmail - they
> are in my "known signers" list:
>
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 CONNECT: Accepting connection from: 209.85.215.196 -
> not blocked by any RBL
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 HELO: Accepted HELO/EHLO mail-ea0-f196.google.com
> from remote host: 209.85.215.196 (mail-ea0-f196.google.com)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 HELO: Accepted HELO/EHLO mail-ea0-f196.google.com
> from remote host: 209.85.215.196 (mail-ea0-f196.google.com)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 MAIL: SPF Result=pass (gmail.com /
> mail-ea0-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196])
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 MAIL: Accept from: mike.tubby80@??? host:
> mail-ea0-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196]
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 RCPT: SPF Result2=pass (gmail.com /
> mail-ea0-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196])
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep DKIM: d=gmail.com s=20120113
> c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha256 [verification succeeded]
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep DKIM START: domain=gmail.com
> possible_signer=gmail.com status=pass
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep DKIM PASS: Accepted gmail.com is
> known signer and has good signature
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep MIME: Type=multipart/alternative Size=1
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep MIME: Type=text/plain Size=1
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep MIME: Type=text/html Size=1
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: Start ACL with scan profile: 2
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: Couldn't verify HELO/EHLO
> greeting (mail-ea0-f196.google.com) from remote host: 209.85.215.196
> (mail-ea0-f196.google.com)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: SPAM: Enabled in scan
> profile (will test, reject at 5.0)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: SPAM Score: -0.4 (/)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: ClamAV: Enabled in scan
> profile (will test)
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: Added custom header:
> X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep CONTENT: Checks completed, content
> accepted
> 2014-02-27 23:52:09 1WJAkL-0002Ld-Ep <= mike.tubby80@???
> H=mail-ea0-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196] P=esmtps X=TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128
> S=3105
> id=CAAnpCNJqpST7cjTLyw3m6gR2mhTZWjx_wdGsQu=UBCUD6pDmtA@???
> T="gmail testing"
>
> Google are good guys!
>
>
>
> Site mrredonline.com are not in my "known signers" and appear to be broken:
>
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 CONNECT: Accepting connection from: 178.33.94.52 -
> not blocked by any RBL
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 HELO: Accepted HELO/EHLO ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com
> from remote host: 178.33.94.52 (ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com)
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 MAIL: SPF Result=neutral (ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com /
> ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com [178.33.94.52])
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 MAIL: Accept from: bounce@???
> host: ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com [178.33.94.52]
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 RCPT: SPF Result2=neutral (ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com /
> ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com [178.33.94.52])
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 1WJAnl-0002M4-4x DKIM: d=ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com
> s=dkim c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha1 i=info@???
> [invalid - public key record (currently?) unavailable]
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 1WJAnl-0002M4-4x DKIM START:
> domain=ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com possible_signer=ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com
> status=invalid (reason=pubkey_unavailable)
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 1WJAnl-0002M4-4x DKIM DEFER:
> domain=ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com
> 2014-02-27 23:55:41 1WJAnl-0002M4-4x H=ukb8mx4.mrredonline.com
> [178.33.94.52] temporarily rejected DKIM : Message from
> ukb8mx6.mrredonline.com cannot be verified
>
> which appears correct - they are a gambling site and appear to be
> sending our a DKIM header, but probing them with ProtoDave's checker tool:
>
>     http://www.protodave.com/tools/dkim-key-checker/

>
> they don't have a public key under that selector... so I defer them...
> seems appropriate to me... I will keep deferring them until they fix
> their public key and then I might accept them!
>
>
>
> Amazon are not in my "known signers" and appear to be ok:
>
> 2014-02-28 00:01:02 CONNECT: Accepting connection from: 54.240.0.151 -
> not blocked by any RBL
> 2014-02-28 00:01:02 HELO: Accepted HELO/EHLO
> a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com from remote host: 54.240.0.151
> (a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com)
> 2014-02-28 00:01:02 MAIL: SPF Result=pass (bounces.amazon.com /
> a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com [54.240.0.151])
> 2014-02-28 00:01:02 MAIL: Accept from:
> 20140228000100daea22bcd6364808b4c0b369d29f3840-C19ZNAY18YA6WZ@???
> host: a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com [54.240.0.151]
> 2014-02-28 00:01:02 RCPT: SPF Result2=pass (bounces.amazon.com /
> a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com [54.240.0.151])
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 DKIM: d=amazon.co.uk
> s=kfypa4gzdotgdqwujmwyfqhv7hoigmat c=relaxed/simple a=rsa-sha256
> t=1393545660 [verification succeeded]
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 DKIM START:
> domain=bounces.amazon.com possible_signer=amazon.co.uk status=pass
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 DKIM DEFAULT:
> domain=bounces.amazon.com - message accepted (at end of ACL)
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 MIME: Type=multipart/mixed Size=47
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 MIME: Type=multipart/alternative
> Size=47
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 MIME: Type=text/plain Size=2
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 MIME: Type=text/html Size=42
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 CONTENT: Start ACL with scan profile: 1
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 CONTENT: Couldn't verify HELO/EHLO
> greeting (a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com) from remote host:
> 54.240.0.151 (a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com)
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 CONTENT: Checks skipped: SPF
> Whitelisted
> 2014-02-28 00:01:12 1WJAt6-0002NM-C8 <=
> 20140228000100daea22bcd6364808b4c0b369d29f3840-C19ZNAY18YA6WZ@???
> H=a0-151.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com [54.240.0.151] P=esmtp S=49226
> id=0000014475cb4934-183da1b1-d8b2-4c51-9d5c-70409cd1b646-000000@???
> T="Feb 28: Today's Deal of the Day"
>
> if they are know DKIM signing everything then - perhaps I should
> elevate them to "known signer" status?
>
>
>
> Paddy Power are not in my "known signers", but the DKIM header is found:
>
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 CONNECT: Accepting connection from: 89.21.232.58 -
> not blocked by any RBL
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 HELO: Accepted HELO/EHLO
> mail232-58.send.smartfocusdigital.net from remote host: 89.21.232.58
> (mail232-58.send.smartfocusdigital.net)
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 MAIL: Accept from: sports@???
> host: mail232-58.send.smartfocusdigital.net [89.21.232.58]
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 1WJAds-0002J9-84 DKIM: d=ppmail.paddypower.com
> s=shared_key c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha1 i=sports@???
> [invalid - public key record (currently?) unavailable]
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 1WJAds-0002J9-84 DKIM START:
> domain=ppmail.paddypower.com possible_signer=ppmail.paddypower.com
> status=invalid (reason=pubkey_unavailable)
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 1WJAds-0002J9-84 DKIM DEFER:
> domain=ppmail.paddypower.com
> 2014-02-27 23:45:28 1WJAds-0002J9-84
> H=mail232-58.send.smartfocusdigital.net [89.21.232.58] temporarily
> rejected DKIM : Message from ppmail.paddypower.com cannot be verified
>
> but they appear to have no public key?
>
>
>
> And the killer one... Facebook... they are in my "known signers" but
> appear to be broken:
>
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 MAIL: SPF Result=pass (facebookmail.com /
> outmail016.ash2.facebook.com (mx-out.facebook.com) [66.220.155.150])
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 MAIL: Accept from:
> notification+kjdmd_m7uvpd@??? host:
> outmail016.ash2.facebook.com (mx-out.facebook.com) [66.220.155.150]
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 RCPT: SPF Result2=pass (facebookmail.com /
> outmail016.ash2.facebook.com (mx-out.facebook.com) [66.220.155.150])
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 1WIyEK-0006vE-Fw DKIM: d=facebookmail.com
> s=s1024-2013-q3 c=relaxed/simple a=rsa-sha256 t=1393497014 [verification
> failed - signature did not verify (headers probably modified in transit)]
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 1WIyEK-0006vE-Fw DKIM START: domain=facebookmail.com
> possible_signer=facebookmail.com status=fail (reason=signature_incorrect)
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 1WIyEK-0006vE-Fw DKIM DENY: Rejected
> facebookmail.com is known signer (in database) but has invalid/missing
> signature
> 2014-02-27 10:30:16 1WIyEK-0006vE-Fw H=outmail016.ash2.facebook.com
> (mx-out.facebook.com) [66.220.155.150] rejected DKIM : Message from
> facebookmail.com (known signer) with invalid or missing signature
>
> am I the only person having problems with Facebook?
>
>
>
>
> Questions:
>
> * is there anything wrong with my design or implementation?
>
> * are there any suggestions for improvements?
>
> * specifically in the case of faceboomail.com do I have something broken
> or is it them?
>
> * do I really need to whitelist facebook as a broken DKIM sender to get
> their mail in?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Mike Tubby
>
>
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/




--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine