Re: [exim] Unrouteable address - All recipients fail

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Heiko Schlittermann
日付:  
To: exim-users
題目: Re: [exim] Unrouteable address - All recipients fail
Hi,

Rob Gunther <redrob@???> (Di 18 Feb 2014 05:00:20 CET):
> I think I figured out my problem, looking for confirmation from experts. I
> do this in the ACL:
>
> # Accept any email on port 26
>   accept condition = ${if=={$received_port}{26}}
>          set acl_m_delivery =
> ${lookup{$local_part}nwildlsearch{/smtpconfig/domains/$domain/deliverydata}}

>
> Access to the server is restricted by firewall, if a delivery is attempted
> on port 26 it is one of our customers. So I lookup the delivery
> information, which can vary per user. From the deliverydata file I extract
> the destination server, forwarding information etc.
>
> I assume that if a message comes in for user1@??? and also to
> user2@??? that there would be two unique sets of variables stored
> in acl_m_delivery? Each user's personal settings would be associated with
> their copy of the message?


No, you have one single copy of the variable, as you have only one
single copy of the message.

If you have multiple recipients, each new recipient overwrites the
acl_m_delivery.

The most simplistic approach: limit the number of recipients per message
to exactly one. The *downside* of this approach: delivery for the other
recipients is deferred, each message is transmitted for each recipient.

    # rcpt acl


        defer   message   = please one by one
                condition = ${if qt{$recipients_count}{1}}


> If two users get a message and one is valid and one is invalid, like this:
>
> valid@???
> invalid@???
>
> Currently when using the acl_m_delivery variable the entire message would
> fail. If the acl_m_delivery information is not unique on a per user basis
> then I have a problem...


You got the problem.

I'm not sure about the maximum size of the acl_ variables, probably you
can append your information

            set acl_m_delivery = $acl_m_deliveriy:${lookup…}


*But* I think, you're trying to do the message routing in the ACL
already. But routing is a job for the router, not the ACL. Make sure
that the routers succeed for valid recipients and fail otherwise. And
then just do in your rcpt acl:

            # rcpt acl
            require verify = recipient


should do the job you want.

    Best regards from Dresden/Germany
    Viele Grüße aus Dresden
    Heiko Schlittermann
-- 
 SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
 Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
 gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: 7CBF764A -
 gnupg fingerprint: 9288 F17D BBF9 9625 5ABC  285C 26A9 687E 7CBF 764A -
(gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2  7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B)-