On Saturday, January 25, 2014 18:45:06 Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 25/01/14 17:48, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > Possible minor documentation bug: the received_header_text (chapter 14)
> > uses "tls_in_cipher" which at least for exim 4.80 is a nonexistent
> > variable; I used tls_cipher in its place.
>
> You're reading the current documentation but using a (now) older exim
> version. The 4.80 docs list tls_cipher.
Yes. Thanks for checking.
I was aware of the version disparity and tried to find the 4.80 documentation,
but documentation for previous versions isn't easy to find on the website.
I seem to remember being able to find this in the past via link(s) to previous
versions, but I don't see [that|those] link(s) now.
> http://exim.org/exim-html-4.80/doc/html/spec_html/ch-string_expansions.html#
> SECTexpvar
received_header_text doesn't appear in the above page, and it feels like it
should as the spec says this is a string that gets expanded during routing.
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.80/doc/html/spec_html/ch-main_configuration.html#SECTalomo
But regardless, you're right -- the 4.80 documentation for the default
received_header_text is correct and has tls_cipher.
Cool. Thanks.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@???
