On 2013-12-01 at 21:03 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > +#define LX_proxy 0x88000000
>
> Is anyone working on LX2 or any other means of handling logging? You've
> just taken the last available LX slot. You were right to do so, but it
> does leave us with a problem.
Uhm, I was being a little dumb.
You've taken the 28th of 31 available slots. The next three will,
barring expansion, be defined as:
#define LX_foo1 0x90000000
#define LX_foo2 0xA0000000
#define LX_foo3 0xC0000000
Sorry, I was apparently wearing horse blinkers.
Still, the warning sign that we need to have A Plan.
-Phil
