On 18/10/13 03:39, Brent Jones wrote:
> Peeked at the source code, but it is outside my abilities to modify.
> Wonder if it could be a feature request :)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Brent Jones <brent@???> wrote:
>
>> What about extending the "defer_ok" function to ACLs other than callouts
>> and virus scanning?
>> That way, if you have an ACL that does a DB lookup, you can add the
>> /defer_ok switch to the condition, and allow that ACL to accept itself if
>> there is a problem?
You could use a variant of the technique shown in bug 251, perhaps?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
