On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Metzler <eximusers@???> wrote: > On 2013-09-26 Todd Lyons <tlyons@???> wrote:
>> I have uploaded Exim 4.82 RC1 to
> It builds ok and seems to work for me (see headers ;-), it does not
> advertise itself as 4.82, though:
> ametzler@argenau:$ /usr/sbin/exim4 -be '$version_number'
> 4.80_230-b1f3784
My fault. I just tagged it instead of doing a signed tag. The
reversion script extracts that version information from the latest tag
and specifically ignores non-annotated tags.
> Also the txt docs are empty:
> ametzler@argenau:/tmp/EXIM4/exim-4.82$ ls -l doc/filter.txt doc/spec.txt
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ametzler ametzler 0 Sep 26 14:41 doc/filter.txt
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ametzler ametzler 0 Sep 26 14:41 doc/spec.txt
I'll fix it before I do the next release.
...Todd
--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
