Re: [exim] plaintext pam

On Tue 28 May 2013 16:12:33 andreas graeper wrote:
> hi lena,
> thanks for your answer
>
> why 'why pam ?' ??

It might be easier (and more convenient) to achieve the same result
using sasl authenticator.

Best regards,
– Jubal

--
In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.