Re: [exim] detection of "<>" in case of spam.

On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 22:37 +0400, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote:
> Pointless. Considerable amount of junk traffic consists of real
> and valid bounces, generated to spam mails with forged addresses.
> If you have several old domains with old addresses, some of them
> might be used by spammers, and you would get bounces to these
> addresses when other sites bounce spam mails.

If they are indeed "old" addresses, surely you never send email from
those addresses any more? And thus you never need to accept bounces *to*
this addresses?

In fact, you don't really need to accept bounces to the *new* addresses
either. I don't accept bounces to dwmw2@???, for example,
because I never send MAIL FROM:<dwmw2@???>.

--
dwmw2