On 02/04/2013 00:10, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2013-04-01 at 14:05 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
>>> switch(libdbm_status) - consider a tabled-based coding.
>>
>> Ok, I liked the switch, but I'll work on a table.
>
> For clarity: why consider a table-based config? Is this "have you
> considered ..", or
Purely that. I wondered if table + loop might take less
screen area. Not insisting on the change.
--
Jeremy