Yes, IMHO a log selector is needed. I didn't think about log-parsers.
...Todd
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Jeremy Harris <jgh@???> wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 11:10 PM, Todd Lyons wrote:
>>
>> I think it looks good, nice and clean, and it really only affects a few
>> tests.
>
>
> Do you think a log_selector is needed? It is, after all, modifying an
> existing
> defined element of the major log lines. I'm concerned about the effect on
> log-parsers.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
