Re: [pcre-dev] Help in rewriting broken lookbehind assertion

Top Page
Delete this message
Author: Thorsten Schöning
Date:  
To: pcre-dev
Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] Help in rewriting broken lookbehind assertion
Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning,
am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2012 um 18:38 schrieben Sie:

> I would really appreciate if some of you could have a look at the
> regex and give me some hints about how I could rewrite it to a
> functional lookbehind assertion or something similar usable as a
> whitelist. Thanks for any ideas!


Just to be clear, as I seemed to wrongly mix it: I have a negative
lookbehinde assertion and can accomplish my goal with a source code
change and a positive lookbehinde assertion, but would prefer
something like a negative lookahead assertion, which didn't work for
me, or something similar.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning       E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening@???
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/


Telefon.............030-2 1001-310
Fax...............05151- 9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow