On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, W B Hacker wrote:
--snip--
>
> End of the day, hard-blocking PowerMTA spew is still a low/no hassle plus. It
> has not even required offsetting White Listing. Which, after all, is
> dead-easy, and would have skipped that acl clause and many more.
>
> A very LARGE plus, blocking PowerMTA is, as it smacks the multiple legions of
> entirely unrelated Merchant Bankers that are NOT 'desired' correspondents. It
> isn't as if that MTA had any other purpose but high-volume spew, after all.
>
I have not considered any of the mail I've mentioned to be spam. I've
signed up for it, and in some cases, paid for it.
> I may be lazy. Consumately so.
>
No comment.
> But I 'laze' on the side of the time-efficiency of my user-community, not
> being swamped by spam out of 'you can't DO that' helplessness.
>
If I was a member of your user community, I'd be a bit upset at some of
the spam filtering decisions you're making for me. Your mileage does
vary, apparently.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? No spam, thanks.
Are you the police? . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
--------------------------------------------------------
