W B Hacker <wbh@???> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> solution in GIT (keep 1024 limit, but add tls_dh_min_bits SMTP transport
>> option) is perfectly fine. Which is why we have applied the patch
>> to Debian's exim package.
> Andreas,
> I have no horse in this race, but 'for completeness sake' of those wo
> may, have, how does that square with Marc Haber's note of 3 June with;
> ==
>> The Debian configuration will stay as it is
>> as far as my decision is concened.
> ===
> .. that I took to be a(nother) pico-diverge of sorts..
> Or am I presuming a relationship not germane atall?
Hello,
Marc's mail <E1Sb748-0000Yt-5C@???> was about a
specific, completely different proposed change (Removing syntactically
unneccessary but clarifying "no_more" settings in routers.)
> IOW, WEF 4.8X, will the Debian package differ from 'generic' in other
> than naming, paths, config, other 'usual suspects'?
There are no big changes in 4.80 packaging, see the 2012 entries in
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.80-3/changelog
cu andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
