On 2012-06-05 21:32, Chip wrote:
> On 6/5/2012 4:00 PM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> On 2012-06-05 20:40, Chip wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2012 2:07 PM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>>>> On 2012-06-05 18:30, Chip wrote:
>>>>> Headers are not being changed.
>>>>
>>>> Return_path on a transport changes the envelope sender.
>>>> Not a header.
>>> My mistake with the semantics -- nothing in the headers and anything
>>> relating to return email addresses, errors to, from, etc., including
>>> envelope sender -- has changed. Is there any file or config I can send
>>> for troubleshooting?
>>
>> Have a look a the log; on the delivery line is the expected transport
>> (T=)
>> there? If you add return_path_on_delivery to you log_selector is
>> the expected translated value of return-path (P=) there?
> I've added return_path_on_delivery to log_selector in exim.conf and
> restarted. Here is a snippet from the log. I do notice a couple of
> things that may be contributing to this, but I'm new here so shine some
> guiding light. First I notice that the transport chosen by exim is
> dkim_remote_smtp and I'm asking it to use verp_smtp.
Well, it's going wrong before that point so I'm afraid you aren't.....
Go back and look at the routers. It ends up using the dkim_lookuphost
router according to that log; work out why. Bear in mind that
the order of routers matters.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
