Re: [exim-dev] dnssec

On 2012-06-02 08:19, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-06-01 at 22:01 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> I'm guessing from the message, due to 1f4a55daf :
>
> Yes. For now, just accept the update. We're going to have to figure
> out flag-controllable munging, so that we can munge this away *unless*
> the test is about DNSSEC in particular.

I kinda think we need per-testcase-custom munge filters, in addition
to (and possibly subsuming parts of) the wedge of string-translations
done by munge() in runtest. A layer of indirection would provide for
common cases - the present case would have all of
0002, 0094, 0381, 2202
all pointing to a single script doing
'grep -v "Reverse DNS security status"' on stderr.

Would this do?
--
Jeremy