Autor: Regid Ichira Data: Dla: exim-users Temat: Re: [exim] Am I right that no_more has no effect within the
included simple routers?
There is already a thread for that subject. I hope this message will get
into it.
> Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 10:48:18 +0200
> From: Marc Haber
> Message-ID: <E1SYZ98-0007da-DE@???>
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 03:03:47 -0700 (PDT), Regid Ichira wrote:
> >1) nonlocal:
> > driver = redirect
> > domains = ! +local_domains
> > allow_fail
> > data = :fail: Mailing to remote
> domains not supported
> > no_more
> >
> >2) dnslookup_relay_to_domains:
> > driver = dnslookup
> > domains = ! +local_domains :
> +relay_to_domains
> > transport = remote_smtp
> > same_domain_copy_routing = yes
> > no_more
>
> Those have been taken from the Debian configuration. This is Debian's
> full routers configuration (sans .if[n]def and comments, but in
> order):
>
> |begin routers
> |
> |domain_literal:
> | driver = ipliteral
> | domains = ! +local_domains
> | transport = remote_smtp
> |
> |hubbed_hosts:
> | driver = manualroute
> | domains = "${if exists{CONFDIR/hubbed_hosts}\
> |
> {partial-lsearch;CONFDIR/hubbed_hosts}\
> | fail}"
> | same_domain_copy_routing = yes
> | route_data =
> ${lookup{$domain}partial-lsearch{CONFDIR/hubbed_hosts}}
> | transport = remote_smtp
> |
> |dnslookup_relay_to_domains:
> | driver = dnslookup
> | domains = ! +local_domains : +relay_to_domains
> | transport = remote_smtp
> | same_domain_copy_routing = yes
> | no_more
> |
> |dnslookup:
> | driver = dnslookup
> | domains = ! +local_domains
> | transport = remote_smtp
> | same_domain_copy_routing = yes
> | # ignore private rfc1918 and APIPA addresses
> | ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8 :
> 192.168.0.0/16 :\
> |
> 172.16.0.0/12 : 10.0.0.0/8 :
> 169.254.0.0/16 :\
> |
> 255.255.255.255
> | no_more
> |
> |nonlocal:
> | driver = redirect
> | domains = ! +local_domains
> | allow_fail
> | data = :fail: Mailing to remote domains not
> supported
> | no_more
> |
> |smarthost:
> | driver = manualroute
> | domains = ! +local_domains
> | transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
> | route_list = * DCsmarthost byname
> | host_find_failed = defer
> | same_domain_copy_routing = yes
> | no_more
>
> Does the no_more hurt on any of the routers where we set it? I think
> that we set no_more on all routers that take parts of the upstream
> default's dnslookup router. I think it is more easily understood that
> way, but I am open to (convincing) arguments.
>
> If the no_more statements don't hurt, I'd rather keep them in place
> for the sake of not making unnecessary changes.
>
I think the no_more has significance for dnslookup_relay_to_domains and
for dnslookup. It has no effect for nonlocal and smarthost.
One advantage for keeping the no effect no_more in place is not making
unnecessary changes. One might argue whether keeping that no effect
directive makes the default configuration more, or less, readable.
My opinion is that a concise configuration is better.