On 2012-05-21 at 14:58 +0100, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > Any idea if they're moving towards the NetBSD resolver changes?
>
> Not sure what these changes are.
Thread-safety with a different set of resolver routines avoiding _res.
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?resolver++NetBSD-6.0
> They seem to be moving towards ditching BIND and replacing it with
> unbound:
I have unbound as the system resolver on my dev box, for validating
DNSSEC; it doesn't change the libc interfaces. It's just something
else to listen on ports 53.
It includes a libunbound, which can be used *instead* of the libc
interfaces. It doesn't include variants for getaddrinfo() et al.
-Phil
