On 2012-05-20 00:19, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2012-05-19 at 23:43 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> On 2012-05-19 23:34, Phil Pennock wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-19 at 23:28 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>>>> - s/X=TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256/X=TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256/g;
>>>> + s/TLS1.[012]:(DHE_)?RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA(1|256):256/TLS1.x:xxxxRSA_AES_256_CBC_SHAnnn:256/g;
>> [...]
>>> Is it necessary to drop the X= ? There were other instances where this
>>> was needed?
>>
>> Yes, the same canonicalisation is needed for a (Received ?) header.
>
> *sigh* Well, the text suite is not part of the release, merely run for
> the release, so feel free to make whatever changes you think best here.
> As long as it still runs on my GnuTLS 2.12.x and 2.10.x test boxes I'll
> be happy.
Pushed that; would you like to give it a whirl?
--
Jeremy
