Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 1184] code refactoring in acl.c

On 2012-03-30 at 06:51 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
> But then I get slight errors on each test. This is typical output:
>
> 220 the.local.host.name ESMTP Exim 4.77_1102-226c389 Tue, 2 Mar 1999
> 09:44:33 +0000
> ----------
> 220 the.local.host.name ESMTP Exim x.yz Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

So the version number should have been changed in the tested binary by
patchexim.

Looks as though the last changes were by me in October when I found that
the new version numbers generated by the build system were not handled
by the test suite, so I fixed the tests to run as part of the release
process.

Further, it looks like I missed some other output formats.
runtest normalises output. Looks like the regexp isn't matching that
version string. The underscore is the problem.

I've fixed patchexim to handle this variant too.

-Phil