Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- From:
>> exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@???
>> [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org] On Behalf Of
>> Jeremy Harris Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:28 PM To:
>> exim-users@??? Subject: Re: [exim] Including state information
>> in Received fields
>>
>> Exim would not need to; the format of the Recieved header line is
>> entirely under the control of the exim config file and could be set
>> up to include such information. Also any such processing modes or
>> states would be implemented by the config file (it's a complete
>> programming language and can hook to external facilities).
>
> Hey, that's pretty nice. I guess then it becomes a matter of
> educating users on this new option if it gets standardized.
>
> Thanks, -MSK
>
MOST things to be done wth Exim are simply a matter of 'educating and
understanding'.
And MOST have been in it for many years.
Many of the 'added' features' are just to make it easier to get at an
existing capablity with a more standardized 'radio knob'.
Bill
--
韓家標
