[exim-dev] Unintended consequence of accepting LF . LF
|This message is part of the following thread:|
|the complete thread tree sorted by date|
In packet 4172, exim replied "250 OK id=blah". So I looked before that to see if there was a CR LF . CR LF sequence, but didn't find one. On a whim, I searched for LF . LF and found it: In packet 4100 was the sequence 0a 2e 0a, i.e. just line feeds, no carriage returns.
|This message was posted to the following mailing lists:|
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages
|[exim-dev] [Bug 1195] New: read_message_data_smtp should comply with RFC5321||[exim-dev] [Bug 1195] read_message_data_smtp should comply with RFC5321|
|Tahini and Hummus Development Archives administrated by Hummus Admins||Lurker (version 2.3)|