------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049
--- Comment #22 from Philip Hazel <ph10@???> 2011-11-15 09:58:33 ---
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> I am still thinking about whether we need two header files. In C we can define
> functions without actually implement them. Thus we could have one header with
> all function prototypes.
Indeed.
> And if we would introduce a macro which appends _16 to all _pcre symbols with
> ## preprocessor directive, we could build both libraries in the same time. That
> would be the most convenient way, perhaps.
I remembered last night that I did not suggest pcre_compile16 as a name,
but rather pcre16_compile. So we don't have an ugliness with
pcre16_compile2 at all. It isn't really a big issue, but I think the two
sets
pcre_compile pcre16_compile
pcre_exec pcre16_exec
etc.
is a bit neater than
pcre_compile pcre_compile_16
pcre_exec pcre_exec_16
In an alphabetic listing all the pcre16's would sort together.
Philip
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
