Just a little "up" with a link with the whole issue :
http://www.lutix.org/?page=questions#exim_1
Thanks for your help!
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Fabien LUCE wrote:
> But why all directories used in my Sieve file are considered are routed
> to a directory_transport and the inbox would be routed to a
> file_transport?
>
> Secondly, how could I do to bounce the adress to the next router at the
> end of my Sieve file?
>
> thx
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:15:15PM +0200, Michael Haardt wrote:
> > > the next router (well named local_delivery) is not reached...
> > > instead of, an exim -bt <adress> command gives me:
> > > >Implicit keep
> > > >ftg@??? -> inbox
> > > >*** Error in setting up pipe, file, or autoreply:
> > > >file_transport unset in userforward router
> > >
> > > Firstly, could someone explain to me why a file_transport is needed since
> > > a "directory delivery" is done?
> >
> > Because "inbox" does not look like a directory. You should map "inbox"
> > in the transport to whereever your inbox is stored, like this (untested):
> >
> > file = ${if eq{$address_file}{inbox} \
> > {$home/Maildir} \
> > {${if eq{${substr_0_1:$address_file}}{/} \
> > {$address_file} \
> > {$home/Maildir/.$address_file} \
> > }} \
> > }
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --
> > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
> --
> Fabien LUCE
> Clef PGP: http://lutix.org/data/ftg_lutix_pub.asc
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
--
Fabien LUCE
Clef PGP:
http://lutix.org/data/ftg_lutix_pub.asc
