But why all directories used in my Sieve file are considered are routed
to a directory_transport and the inbox would be routed to a
file_transport?
Secondly, how could I do to bounce the adress to the next router at the
end of my Sieve file?
thx
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:15:15PM +0200, Michael Haardt wrote:
> > the next router (well named local_delivery) is not reached...
> > instead of, an exim -bt <adress> command gives me:
> > >Implicit keep
> > >ftg@??? -> inbox
> > >*** Error in setting up pipe, file, or autoreply:
> > >file_transport unset in userforward router
> >
> > Firstly, could someone explain to me why a file_transport is needed since
> > a "directory delivery" is done?
>
> Because "inbox" does not look like a directory. You should map "inbox"
> in the transport to whereever your inbox is stored, like this (untested):
>
> file = ${if eq{$address_file}{inbox} \
> {$home/Maildir} \
> {${if eq{${substr_0_1:$address_file}}{/} \
> {$address_file} \
> {$home/Maildir/.$address_file} \
> }} \
> }
>
> Michael
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
--
Fabien LUCE
Clef PGP:
http://lutix.org/data/ftg_lutix_pub.asc
