On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:23 +0000, W B Hacker wrote:
> At some earlier stage, transfer what you need into an acl_m variable and
> use that.
Good idea.
> CAVEAT: 'Many' of the limitations on what one can and cannot do in the
> DATA phase stem from the possible case that 'the (single) message' being
> evaluted may have multiple recipients, not all necessarily with the same
> domain.tld Carrying MULTIPLE acl_m variables cannot always help and
> gets a mite tedious anyway.
>
> ERGO: Whatever workaround, such as the above, works for the
> statistically common, but seldom guaranteed, single-recipient case, will
> fail you or fool you if/as/when there are multiple recipients.
>
> Test throughly.
Absolutely else the PANIC log gets filled-up and everything grinds to a
halt.
