I rebuilt RC1 without JIT support and when I run the RunTest script from
the Msys console for that build, the script has no issues. It is only
when built with JIT support I have the issue described. The attachment
must have been too big for the list, so I sent it separately to Philip.
Also I played with test3 and found that in order for it to run under
Msys, the French locale would need to be specified with "fr" (not
"fr_FR" or "french").
Regards,
Sheri
> I built 8.20-RC1 on Windows XP in Msys/MINGW32 (simulated Unix environment)
> configured with Cmake 2.8 using my usual options plus JIT support.
>
> pcretest -C reports:
>
> PCRE version 8.20-RC1 2011-09-12
> Compiled with
> UTF-8 support
> Unicode properties support
> Just-in-time compiler support
> Newline sequence is ANYCRLF
> \R matches CR, LF, or CRLF only
> Internal link size = 2
> POSIX malloc threshold = 10
> Default match limit = 10000000
> Default recursion depth limit = 10000000
> Match recursion uses heap
>
> The size of my pcre shared library went from 289KB to 453KB
>
> In previous versions I was able to use the included RunTest scripts
> from the Msys console without exception (aside from test3 which never
> runs at all from the Runtest script due I think to an erroneous grep
> or sed error for "french"). Also RunTest.bat executed in the Windows
> command environment always worked fine (including test3). Running
> RunTest.bat in the Windows cmd environment still works fine and
> reports no discrepancies for 8.20-RC1. The bat file should be
> updated as it only runs tests 1 thru 12.
>
> However there are numerous differences for 8.20-RC1 if I run the
> RunTest sh script from my Msys console (in tests 1, 2, 4 and 11).
> I manually renamed the interim testtry files to capture them and have
> attached a zip file of the output from those tests. The same tests
> operate successfully via RunTest.bat using Windows cmd. As I said
> previously, the RunTest sh scripts of previous versions didn't have
> these issues.
>
> Also, running the pcre_jit_test program apparently reports a discrepancy.
> Among its output series of dots in the output is this:
>
> Return value differs(-1:1): 'ab$' @ 'ab
> '
> Successful test ratio: 99%
>
