Re: [pcre-dev] A performance question about PCRE library

Hi, Philip,

Thank you so much. Your reply is helpful.

2011/8/16 Philip Hazel <ph10@???>:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, I wrote:
>
>> I tried studying the combined pattern, assuming it would find a starting
>> byte set of < o t and u (which is what studying does), but it didn't.
>> This I think is a bug in pcre_study(), which I will investigate (just in
>> time for the forthcoming 8.13 release). Looks like it is the initial \b
>> in three patterns that is foxing it, because when I remove that, it does
>> find the starting bytes.
>
> Yes, it was a simple bug, for which I have committed a patch. If you
> study the pattern, the 8.13 release should be somewhat faster. With luck
> this release might be out tomorrow.
>
> Philip
>
> --
> Philip Hazel
>