------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134
--- Comment #4 from Philip Hazel <ph10@???> 2011-08-14 20:13:10 ---
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> I am thinking how this feature affects the jit compiler, since the machine code
> is part of the PCRE study data, but it cannot be reloaded (because pointers are
> directly encoded into the instruction stream). Maybe the pointer should be
> cleared before the study data is saved.
I had realized that there was an issue here, and was going to email you
about it. I guessed that the JIT data was not saveable, so the
documentation will have to state that clearly. As it is up to the user
to do the saving/restoring, there is nothing PCRE can do about clearing
the pointer. I guess we say something like this: "If you are using the
JIT optimization, note that the JIT study data cannot be saved and
restored. You will have to re-study the compiled pattern after reloading
if you want to recreate the JIT data." I am also planning on providing
an info call so that the user can tell whether JIT-study was successful.
In practice, I don't think many people actually use the save/restore
facility.
I have had no feedback on the RC (except from you). I have other things
to do for some of tomorrow, but as soon as I have time (maybe tomorrow
afternoon, maybe Tuesday morning) I will make the proper 8.13 release
and put it out. Then, as soon as you send me the corresponding JIT
patches (or full code; I can do my own compares :-) I will start on the
integration ... before people start reporting the next lot of bugs. :-(
Philip
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
