Re: [exim] question regarding spamassassin in exim, especial…

Phil Pennock wrote:

> I don't use SA and hadn't looked at sa-exim's implementation before now.
>
> Make sure you set "SAspamcSockPath" to get to use the daemon instead of
> parsing all the Perl modules for every spam received.
>
> Otherwise, there's a little more overhead even then from sa-exim but not
> enough to worry about on any modern system (reads a config file, exec's
> another binary; on the same order of the work that Exim does routinely
> anyway, so I don't expect it to be an issue).

OK. Will stick with sa-exim for now then.

Thanks,

David Mathog
mathog@???
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech