Author: David Mathog Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [exim] question regarding spamassassin in exim,
especially headers
Phil Pennock wrote:
> I don't use SA and hadn't looked at sa-exim's implementation before now.
>
> Make sure you set "SAspamcSockPath" to get to use the daemon instead of
> parsing all the Perl modules for every spam received.
>
> Otherwise, there's a little more overhead even then from sa-exim but not
> enough to worry about on any modern system (reads a config file, exec's
> another binary; on the same order of the work that Exim does routinely
> anyway, so I don't expect it to be an issue).
OK. Will stick with sa-exim for now then.
Thanks,
David Mathog
mathog@???
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
