Author: Bill Hayles Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [exim] Gmail's new 'suspicious sender' flag
Hi, Martin
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:01:30 +0100 in message number <201107061501.31448@???>, received here on 06/07/2011 16:28:59, Martin Nicholas <subscriptions.private@???> said:
>
> I'd say that SPAM filtering causes more lost mail: silently discarded, placed
> in the SPAM folder never to be seen again, than trouble with SPF. The
> difference being the results of an SPF check failure is returned to you and is
> thus visible, false positives 'magically' disappear - no problem at all there
> then ;-)
> Which is why my server does NO spam filtering. It's up to the users what to
do about spam; for all I know they may be interested in those offers from
the kind people in the penis enlargement lobby. That's how my users like it.
