Uh, that is bad for me. PCRE-sljit follows the PERL way, and not PCRE here... But both work in the same way without the \1 (and the position is properly recorded).
Regards,
Zoltan
ND <nadenj@???> írta:
>On 2011-05-02 15:48, Herczeg Zoltán wrote:>
>It is true, that you may have several forms to achive the same purpose, >
> but I would prefer a conditional block here since that would be much >
> more reasonable: (?(?=a(b)))>
>>
>
And then you meet another compatibility problem:>
PCRE unlike Perl don't capture subpatterns in assertions-conditions.>
Here is pcretest listing:>
>
>
PCRE version 8.11 2010-12-10>
/(?(?=a(b)).*d\1|.*d)/s>
abdb>
0: bd>
>
-- >
## List details at
https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
