S Pratap Singh wrote:
> As Leena Suggested to test DKIM on check-auth()verifier.port25.com
> Here is the result
>
> The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
>
> ==========================================================
> Summary of Results
> ==========================================================
> SPF check: pass
> DomainKeys check: neutral
> DKIM check: pass
> Sender-ID check: pass
> SpamAssassin check: ham
>
>
> Thank you
> Pratap Singh
Pratap,
That's all well and good.
And the 'newness' of the domain.tld and short TTL in the DNS will *eventually*
not be a barrier, either.
But before you invest much more effort in testing, have a think on what Todd
pointed out, and I confirmed:
The .info TLD has a bad reputation.
Bad enough to not only get diverted to spam, but even unconditionally hard-blocked.
Not everyone will do that, but our experience is not unique.
EG: If .info is not spam-always, then .info is spam-mostly.
If you don't want to use a less notorious TLD than .info, then perhaps using a
'smarthost' with a less obnoxious TLD for your outbound traffic would be wise.
If your business plan was to send unsolicited, or 'formerly' solicited, but now
nuisance traffic, then - hey - just keep right on with what you are doing. Those
flies will never reach MY watermelon.
;-)
Bill
