------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066
--- Comment #15 from Graeme Fowler <graeme@???> 2011-01-16 13:41:33 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> If this feature will be implemented, then the complementary
> "downgrade_rcpt_5xx_to_4xx" needed too. Because the "5xx Over Quota" response
> happens not once nor twice. It is not violates the standard, but when I have
> large mailing list and wish to delete dead addresses from it automatically, I
> prefer the 4xx responses for the temporary errors same as "Over Quota".
Pardon me for having a good old laugh about this now :-D
So we've gone from a single-barrel to a double-barrel way of being able to blow
your own feet off.
I'm not willing to accept either of these requests (as I have previously
explained). What next - a switch to mangle 2xx responses?
As I already wrote, RFC5321 states that the codes should be honoured and the
text informational. You're asking for a massive change to that trust model.
Graeme
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
