------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Graeme Fowler <graeme@???> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |graeme@???
--- Comment #4 from Graeme Fowler <graeme@???> 2011-01-13 09:32:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What you think about the configuration option "acl_recursion_depth" with
> hardcoded maximum value 200 and default 20? I can made this patch if it
> pointful.
That was suggested as an alternative in the original discussion of this idea,
but a patch was not forthcoming.
In my opinion this is potentially a good solution *as long as* no other
maintainers object.
If implemented we should document it in the spec but _not_ include it in any
way in the default configuration file. There are already many ways new users
can shoot themselves below the kneew, we should not be encouraging them to put
the barrel against their temple :)
> Not all things can be made by the ${reduce ...}
> How can I iterate through, for example, ${lookup dnsdb ...} result? Or
> $recipients list?
> I would not use recursion if something same as "while" cycle exists. But in
> exim configuration I have not any cycle operator.
Those operators would be:
forall{<a list>}{<a condition>}
forany{<a list>}{<a condition>}
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch11.html
Graeme
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
