> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-bounces@??? [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Metzler
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:57 AM
> To: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] Handling malformed header fields
Hi Andreas,
> In both cases the broken header is interpreted as the first body
> line. (In case somebody is wondering: verify = header_syntax does not
> make a difference.)
Thanks, that's useful information. In terms of the data collected so far, exim does the same as all the other respondents in the first case, but they're the only one that does that in the second case; everyone else eats the errant space, as it has no semantic value according to RFC5322, and sends it on thus modified.
Cheers,
-MSK
