Re: [exim] RFC: bool_lax{} naming

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Jim Cheetham
Data:  
A: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] RFC: bool_lax{} naming
Quoting Phil Pennock (from 15/06/10 10:02):
> ----------------------------8< cut here >8------------------------------
>  8. There is a new expansion operator, bool_lax{}.  Where bool{} uses the ACL
>     condition logic to determine truth/failure and will fail to expand many
>     strings, bool_lax{} uses the router condition logic, where most strings
>     do evaluate true.
>     Note: bool{00} is false, bool_lax{00} is true.


bool_exp (short for bool_expand)
bool_eval
bool_true

Perhaps provide an alias for bool called bool_acl to highlight the
difference?

-jim