Ian Eiloart <iane@???> (Fr 11 Jun 2010 18:25:45 CEST): > >>Or is this something useful for other Exim users, too?
> >
> >Could be - in case we have to prove that we didn't change the message
> >after reception (the hash has to be signed, of course).
> So, why not use the DKIM features?
Stupid question maybe: does the DKIM signature include the message body?
(I always thought, it's only a signature for selected header fields.)
--
Heiko
