Re: [exim] ldap_default_servers vs. spamd

Author: Phil Pennock
Date:
To: W B Hacker
CC: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] ldap_default_servers vs. spamd_address

On 2010-05-26 at 06:58 -0400, W B Hacker wrote:
> Frank Elsner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > because I'm curious ... why the different handling?
> >
> > ldap_default_servers ... "... are tried in turn until one successfully ..." > > spamd_address ... "The servers are queried in a random fashion"

>
> Purely a SWAG, but my guess as to the rationale is that:

My guess is:

- that's what the contributors who supplied the code felt like doing

-Phil

This message is part of the following thread:
	the complete thread tree sorted by date
	W B Hacker at