Re: [exim] *Suspect* Re: strict_rfc821_envelopes

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nigel Metheringham
Date:  
To: W B Hacker
CC: exim users
New-Topics: Re: [exim] strict_rfc821_envelopes
Subject: Re: [exim] *Suspect* Re: strict_rfc821_envelopes
On 13 May 2010, at 15:50, W B Hacker wrote:
>
> Have a look at Exim's 'verify = header_syntax' and its many finer-grained
> sputniks. Also acl clauses you can hand-implement all the way down to minute and
> insanely specific detail w/r substrings or individual characters.


I suspect this is not looking at the same thing as the postfix option -
which appears to be looking at envelope rather than header addresses.

    Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham             Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]