Re: [exim] if or if and example wrong?

On 2010-05-06 at 08:55 +0100, Ron White wrote:
> Thank you Phil. This fixed the issue and I have a (slightly) better
> understanding of what is going on now. I note the change from eq to ==
> as well. I guess that == is for numerical evaluations where as eq is
> more suited to string? Similar to Perl?

Yes. §11.7, "Expansion conditions", lists all the conditions.