On 19/02/2010 09:41, Mike Cardwell wrote:
>> While this works fine:
>>
>> and {
>> { eq{}{} }
>> { eq{}{} }
>> }
>>
>> but does not allow for nested conditions since there is no "else". So I
>> need an if-condition so I can extend the "that" later.
>
> The alternative way of using eq allows that...
>
> "eq{foo}{bar}{then}{else}"
>
> "eq{foo}{bar}" on it's own is equivalent to:
>
> "eq{foo}{bar}{true}{false}"
>
> So you can do stuff like this:
>
> and {\
> {\
> eq{foo}{bar}\
> {eq{x}{y}}\
> {eq{a}{b}}\
> }\
> {\
> eq{1}{2}\
> }\
> }
Actually... Everything I said above is rubbish.
--
Mike Cardwell : UK based IT Consultant, Perl developer, Linux admin
Cardwell IT Ltd. : UK Company - http://cardwellit.com/ #06920226
Technical Blog : Tech Blog - https://secure.grepular.com/
Spamalyser : Spam Tool - http://spamalyser.com/
