Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting

Páxina inicial
Borrar esta mensaxe
Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: Email Archive
Data:  
Para: David Woodhouse
CC: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting
Yes I am. I've found that, at least for me, it takes a lot less CPU to
greylist all mail and then scan (ClamAV and Spamassassin) the messages
that make it back through. The less I have to run through Spamassassin
the better. I deal with 30 something locations and a few million
messages a day.

I am hoping that moving from Postfix to Exim will give me back some CPU
time. I'm not running MailScanner on the new server. If it does I will
start to look into the selective greylist thing.

For me greylisting all mail eliminates most of my spam and I hardly ever
receive any calls regarding it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:04 PM
> To: Raymond Jette
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: RE: [exim] Issues with greylisting
>
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 15:58 -0500, Raymond Jette wrote:
> > That solved all of my problems. Thank you for your time and help.
>
> No problem. I'll do some more testing of my own when I get
> back from my current trip, and will update the wiki and the
> Fedora package accordingly.
>
> Out of interest -- having read the SimpleGreylisting page on
> the wiki, are you still insisting on greylisting _all_ mail;
> even when there's absolutely no reason for considering it to
> be suspicious?
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
>
>
>