Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting

Páxina inicial
Borrar esta mensaxe
Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: Raymond Jette
Data:  
Para: David Woodhouse
CC: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting
I just removed the commend. The problem still exists. I've been working
on this the last few hours. I'm in better shape that I was through.
Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: Raymond Jette
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: RE: [exim] Issues with greylisting
>
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:11 -0500, Raymond Jette wrote:
> >
> > Attached is a new test and a copy of the greylist config file. I'm
> > having an issue with the acl but working on it.
>
> Hm, the Message-Id: problem is solved, but something else odd
> is happening -- it looks like it's missing the end of the
> greylist ACL.
>
> You can follow your debug output and compare it with the
> source code of the ACL. I'll annotate it with the comments
> from the source...
>
> # If the mail isn't already in the database...
>
> >>> processing "warn"
> >>> check condition = ${if eq {$acl_m_greyexpiry}{} {1}}
> >>>                 =
> >>> warn: condition test failed

>
>
> # Be paranoid, and check if the insertion succeeded...
>
> >>> processing "defer"
> >>> check condition = ${if eq {$acl_m_greyexpiry}{} {1}}
> >>>                 = 
> >>> defer: condition test failed

>
> # Handle the error case (which should never happen)...
>
> >>> end of ACL "greylist_mail": implicit DENY
> >>> require: condition test failed
> 550 Administrative prohibition
> LOG: 1NXc3f-0006bJ-Kd H=(mestek.com) [197.23.3.2]
> F=<rjette@???> rejected after DATA
>
> See that 'end of ACL'? That shouldn't happen -- you've only got as far
> as the comment which says "Handle the error case...". Are you _sure_
> you're including the correct file from your main config?
>
> Or maybe the fact that you have a commented line in the
> _middle_ of the
> previous ACL stanza makes it get parsed weirdly? Try removing the old
> log_message line completely?
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
>
>
>