------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #1 from Philip Hazel <ph10@???> 2010-01-20 16:45:16 ---
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug.
>
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951
> Summary: On systems requiring inttypes.h the include is missing
> in pcre_compile.c
> Product: PCRE
> Version: 8.01
> Platform: Sun
> OS/Version: Solaris
> Status: NEW
> Severity: bug
> Priority: medium
> Component: Code
> AssignedTo: ph10@???
> ReportedBy: dam@???
> CC: pcre-dev@???, dam@???
>
>
> On systems requiring inttypes.h the include is missing when trying to compile
> pcre_compile.c. The error has first occured on 8.01, the version 8.00 works
> fine.
What goes wrong? I guess it's related to the new code in pcre_internal.h
that reads like this:
#if HAVE_STDINT_H
#include <stdint.h>
#endif
#if defined INT64_MAX || defined int64_t
#define INT64_OR_DOUBLE int64_t
#else
#define INT64_OR_DOUBLE double
#endif
On my Linux box (which does have /usr/include/inttypes.h, incidentally),
there is no problem. The only way I can see that this can fail is if
INT64_MAX is defined, but int64_t is neither defined nor typedeffed.
(It is a great pity that C does not contain a preprocessor facility for
asking "is xxx typedeffed?".)
Regards,
Philip
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
