Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting

Página Principal
Apagar esta mensagem
Responder a esta mensagem
Autor: Raymond Jette
Data:  
Para: Todd Lyons
CC: exim-users
Assunto: Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting
I'll take a look at this. Thanks for the link.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tlyons@??? [mailto:tlyons@sitehelp.org] On
> Behalf Of Todd Lyons
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:43 PM
> To: Raymond Jette
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Raymond Jette
> <rjette@???> wrote:
> > Is there a better implementation of greylisting than exim-greylist?
> > Which one is everyone else using? I noticed that
> exim-greylist is no
> > longer maintained.
>
> I use one that only greylists IP addresses that don't have a
> reverse DNS entry. It's described at:
>
> http://wiki.exim.org/GreylistMemcachedPerl
>
> If you wanted it to greylist everything that is inbound, just
> drop the two "!condition" tests in the defer block and it
> should do what you want. Note however, that this uses perl
> and memcached. Another poster here made a simpler config
> with memcache by using native exim commands, and you can find
> it at the end of this thread:
>
> http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20090828.040358.7dcd69f5.en.html
> -- 
> Regards...      Todd
> Real Integrity is doing the right thing, knowing that no 
> body's going to know whether you did it or not.

>
>
>