Re: [exim] Improving Exim Documentation: A Simple Suggestion

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Mike Cardwell
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Improving Exim Documentation: A Simple Suggestion
Ted Cooper wrote:

> A sitemap.xml with appropriate priorities set would get the correct
> ordering - possibly. Google just doesn't seem to be picking up the
> correct keywords or which pages are important.


Should also update robots.txt to prevent search engines indexing really
old versions of the docs.

Should definitely include these:

Disallow: /exim-html-1.90/
Disallow: /exim-html-2.00/
Disallow: /exim-html-2.10/

Should include these as well IMO:

Disallow: /exim-html-3.00/
Disallow: /exim-html-3.10/
Disallow: /exim-html-3.20/
Disallow: /exim-html-3.30/

As for the static vs dynamic argument, XSLT is perfect for this sort of
documentation. You shove the document content in some simple static
files, and then write separate stylesheets for the html version of the
doc, and the pdf version, etc.

--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
Technical Blog: https://secure.grepular.com/blog/