On 14 Oct 2009, at 01:38, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Like these?
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=887
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722 (probably needs some fixup)
>
I've worked through the first few. Will get to the others when I have
time - assuming no one gets there first. Unfortunately its slow work
as I touch the codebase so rarely now. [which is why I am a lousy
maintainer for this stuff - I don't use it and don't code it any more]
We really ought to just get you a commit bit.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
