On 2009-10-13 at 19:21 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:40 +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> > Aren't there are other bugs that should be fixed in a 4.70 release?
>
> Perhaps. That's why there is a testing pre-release available now, per
> other messages.
>
> If there are bugs/features people feel very strongly should be in 4.70,
> get them voted up or produce relevant patches - then they stand a chance
> of inclusion.
Hrm.
Like these?
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=887
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722 (probably needs some fixup)
I got somewhat tired of producing patches to deal with bugs but seeing
the patches just sit in bugzilla, uncommitted; it's not encouraging when
patches are provided and ignored. Even rejection, with solid rationale,
would be better.
-Phil
