Re: [exim-dev] [Exim-maintainers] Exim 4.70

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Dan_Mitton
Fecha:  
A: Tom Kistner
Cc: exim-maintainers, David Woodhouse, exim-dev
Asunto: Re: [exim-dev] [Exim-maintainers] Exim 4.70
I have a BE Sun Solaris machine I believe I can test on. Where can I get
the code?

Dan



Sent by:        exim-dev-bounces@???
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@???>
cc:     exim-maintainers@???, exim-dev@??? (bcc: Dan 
Mitton/YD/RWDOE)
Subject:        Re: [exim-dev] [Exim-maintainers] Exim 4.70
LSN: Not Relevant - Not Privileged
User Filed as: Excl/AdminMgmt-14-4/QA:N/A


David Woodhouse wrote:

> I saw that that particular problem was fixed. But I still have this
> scary feeling that it hadn't really been developed with portability in
> mind.


The stuff you found was copypasta sloppiness. I'm usually not in the
habit of using integer as pointers and vice versa, so if gcc shuts up on
-Wall it's good enough for me(tm).

> The obvious brokenness is fixed, and now it compiles without screaming
> "I am broken!" at you. But I'd be a little happier if I know it had
> really been _tested_ on 64-bit and big-endian platforms. Has it?


No. The only BE machine in my reach is a friend's rusty PARISC box which
we keep around for nostalgic reasons.

I'm not worried about architecture, but more about platform (OS) in
general. Maybe it would be a good idea to release an RC tarball first?

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##